By Richard E. Anderson
A complete presentation of the starting place, nature, and ramifications of the clinical malpractice litigation difficulty, in addition to attainable recommendations and choices to the present bothered process. The authors specialise in the scientific face of litigation from the viewpoint of the training medical professional in quite a few specialties, starting from relations and emergency medication to anesthesiology, obstetrics, gynecology, and cosmetic surgery. targeted attention is given to breast melanoma and Pap smear litigation, danger administration for the kinfolk health practitioner, the rising importance of e-medicine, and the significance of powerful sufferer communique. extra criminal chapters learn the litigation approach itself, delivering perception into successful clinical malpractice court cases, the position of the doctor as specialist witness or defendant, the method of discovery and deposition, and the way a plaintiff's legal professional perspectives hazard relief. For public coverage debate, the authors spell out the case for criminal reform, recommend alterations in medical-legal jurisprudence that may be of instant gain, and examine the wider difficulties of our whole wellbeing and fitness care approach and its interface with legislations and public coverage.
Read or Download Medical Malpractice: A Physician's Sourcebook PDF
Best health & medical law books
Health Law, Human Rights and the Biomedicine Convention: Essays in Honour of Henriette Roscam Abbing
In 1997, the Council of Europe proven the conference on Human Rights and Biomedicine. it truly is usually considered as a massive addition to the final human rights laid down within the ecu conference for the safety of Human Rights and basic Freedoms (1950), particularly so as to the advancements in smooth biology and drugs.
Textbook of Research Ethics: Theory and Practice
This textbook presents a short background of human experimentation and studies quite a few theories of ethics from which the foundations and ideas that govern this examine are derived. All appropriate foreign files and nationwide laws, rules and memoranda are talked about widely to help in addressing concerns that frequently come up in the course of the process examine regarding human matters.
The Vegetative State: Medical Facts, Ethical and Legal Dilemmas
This detailed account surveys the clinical, moral, and felony concerns that encompass the vegetative country. the amount discusses the clinical definition and standards for analysis, its frequency and explanations, and attainable results. the writer additionally explores moral arguments, together with the clash among sanctity of existence and admire for the autonomy and top pursuits of the sufferer, and among killing and letting die.
The politics of blood : ethics, innovation, and the regulation of risk
How most sensible to regulate threat concerning multi-valued human organic fabrics is the overarching topic of this publication, which pulls at the sourcing and provide of blood as a case examine. Blood has moral, social, clinical and advertisement worth. This multi-valuing strategy provides demanding situations when it comes to handling danger, hence making it eventually a question for political accountability.
Additional info for Medical Malpractice: A Physician's Sourcebook
Example text
Only if a mentally ill person did not know what he or she was doing or that it was wrong could the person be excused under this test. Although psychiatrists had come to the conclusion that mental illness seldom caused complete impairment of any human mental function, M'Naghten required a total impairment in cognitive ability. " As a practical matter, very few criminal defendants would be excused, since such extreme dysfunction rarely existed. Contemporary psychiatric theory taught that mental disease impaired a range of mental functions including volition, emotion, and cognition; however, the M'Naghten test accepted cognition as the only type of impairment that would justify a finding of nonresponsibility.
During this period, criminal law was seen primarily as an instrument of social control, and it underwent no dramatic changes. 25 Consequently, deterrence was an important goal of the criminal justice system. The threat of punishment—including imprisonment or even death—for those who might break the law was the ultimate weapon in society's arsenal of crime prevention. Punishment was forward-looking, seeking to influence the future behavior of the criminal and others who might be tempted to commit crimes.
While many neoconservatives favored special efforts to seek out qualified minority candidates for job openings and to widen the applicant pool, they opposed institutionalized rules that would compel hiring through quotas or other similar measures,67 thus minimizing bureaucratic intrusion. By 1989, a number of Supreme Court decisions had delivered a severe blow to civil rights activists supporting affirmative action. President George Bush vetoed the Civil Rights Act of 1990, ostensibly because of his objections to racial quotas.