
By C. T. Sistare (auth.)
autonomy mostly in tenns of the agent's awake number of ends or behavior. From this, the cognitivist emphasis on psychological states and their contents obviously follows. The presence of special psychological states, as signifying agent selection, therefore turns into the hallmark of accountable behavior. Capacities version theorists, in contrast, interpret own autonomy and agent accountability in tenns of the looser inspiration of 'control'. From this attitude, awake picking out is yet one (highly liable) example of such regulate, and the presence or absence of psychological states is basically proper to detennining levels of accountability. The exam of those versions occupies the majority of this manuscript. Exploration of the capacities version and feedback of the orthodox view additionally generate remedy of felony matters akin to using negligence legal responsibility, the character of felony omissions, the nature of assorted criminal defenses, etc. Chapters 2 and three set out a few of the thematic arguments defined above and introduce tenninology and beneficial differences. Chapters four via 7 supply substantial analyses of agent accountability and of criteria of felony legal responsibility. In those chapters, I argue for the comparative superiority of the capacities version of accountability and provide concepts for adjustments in present criminal conceptions and criteria of legal responsibility. each one bankruptcy facilities on a component of person accountability and similar criminal matters. the ultimate bankruptcy, bankruptcy eight, includes an outline of the built-in thought of accountability and legal responsibility and its comparability with the normal view.
Read or Download Responsibility and Criminal Liability PDF
Best health & medical law books
Health Law, Human Rights and the Biomedicine Convention: Essays in Honour of Henriette Roscam Abbing
In 1997, the Council of Europe confirmed the conference on Human Rights and Biomedicine. it's as a rule considered as an enormous addition to the final human rights laid down within the eu conference for the security of Human Rights and primary Freedoms (1950), specifically with the intention to the advancements in sleek biology and medication.
Textbook of Research Ethics: Theory and Practice
This textbook presents a quick background of human experimentation and experiences quite a few theories of ethics from which the rules and ideas that govern this examine are derived. All correct foreign files and nationwide laws, rules and memoranda are stated widely to aid in addressing concerns that frequently come up throughout the process learn concerning human topics.
The Vegetative State: Medical Facts, Ethical and Legal Dilemmas
This designated account surveys the clinical, moral, and criminal matters that encompass the vegetative country. the amount discusses the clinical definition and standards for analysis, its frequency and factors, and attainable results. the writer additionally explores moral arguments, together with the clash among sanctity of lifestyles and appreciate for the autonomy and top pursuits of the sufferer, and among killing and letting die.
The politics of blood : ethics, innovation, and the regulation of risk
How top to control threat regarding multi-valued human organic fabrics is the overarching subject matter of this e-book, which attracts at the sourcing and provide of blood as a case learn. Blood has moral, social, medical and advertisement worth. This multi-valuing procedure offers demanding situations by way of coping with hazard, accordingly making it eventually a question for political accountability.
Extra resources for Responsibility and Criminal Liability
Sample text
The system earns its name by making liability conditional on some degree of imputative responsibility. Since liability for negligence is the bottom standard of a conditional system, our visiting alien would not be liable in the drowning case. Moreover, this system provides for consideration of temporary and permanent incapacities or limitations from which individual agents may suffer. This exclusion from liability of those unable to meet the standard of the 'average' person is intrinsic to the system.
Furthermore, without an appreciation of a system's ultimate purpose{s), we cannot precisely determine how the subsystems will function or the way in which excusing devices will be handled. This is evident from the discussions of subsystems and excusing devices in the preceding sections. The inconclusiveness of those imaginative explorations demonstrates the abstract character of subsystems and excusing LAW AND SOCIETY 37 devices considered apart from concrete socio-cultural perspectives and broad legal goals.
In so doing, it limits liability to what is done, rather than permitting liability for what might occur or what an agent 'could' do. It makes sense for such a system of liability to be accompanied by systems of grading and allotment in which the degree of harm (threatened or realized) is also pertinent. It follows that grading and allotment will be partly determined by reference to a kind of harm principle: the more serious the harm, the more grave the crime and the more severe the punishment. Mitigatory pleas which speak to the harm involved or to the agent's control over the gravity of the harm should be heard in such a system.