
By Alasdair Maclean
Alasdair Maclean analyses the moral foundation for consent to scientific remedy, supplying either an intensive reconsideration of the moral matters and a close exam of English legislations. Importantly, the research is given a context via situating consent on the centre of the healthcare professional-patient dating. this permits the improvement of a relational version that balances the organization of the 2 events with their tasks that come up from that dating. That relational version is then used to critique the present felony rules of consent. To finish, Alasdair Maclean considers the longer term improvement of the legislations and contrasts the version of relational consent with Neil Manson and Onora O'Neill's fresh notion for a version of real consent.
Read Online or Download Autonomy, Informed Consent and Medical Law: A Relational Challenge PDF
Best health & medical law books
Health Law, Human Rights and the Biomedicine Convention: Essays in Honour of Henriette Roscam Abbing
In 1997, the Council of Europe proven the conference on Human Rights and Biomedicine. it's regularly considered as a big addition to the overall human rights laid down within the eu conference for the security of Human Rights and basic Freedoms (1950), specifically with the intention to the advancements in glossy biology and medication.
Textbook of Research Ethics: Theory and Practice
This textbook offers a quick heritage of human experimentation and reports a variety of theories of ethics from which the rules and principles that govern this study are derived. All appropriate overseas records and nationwide laws, rules and memoranda are stated commonly to help in addressing concerns that often come up through the process learn regarding human topics.
The Vegetative State: Medical Facts, Ethical and Legal Dilemmas
This specific account surveys the clinical, moral, and felony concerns that encompass the vegetative country. the amount discusses the clinical definition and standards for analysis, its frequency and motives, and attainable results. the writer additionally explores moral arguments, together with the clash among sanctity of existence and appreciate for the autonomy and top pursuits of the sufferer, and among killing and letting die.
The politics of blood : ethics, innovation, and the regulation of risk
How top to control possibility regarding multi-valued human organic fabrics is the overarching topic of this publication, which attracts at the sourcing and provide of blood as a case learn. Blood has moral, social, clinical and advertisement worth. This multi-valuing technique provides demanding situations by way of coping with chance, for this reason making it eventually an issue for political accountability.
Additional info for Autonomy, Informed Consent and Medical Law: A Relational Challenge
Sample text
5, 75–85. It should be noted that Mill does not use the term ‘autonomy’ but the concept is implicit in a lot of what he argues (see especially 28 Autonomy autonomy in general, but leaves individual irrationally self-harming decisions open to interference. This is because there will certainly be occasions when others can see more clearly than I and are better able to make a good decision for me. 85 This is particularly so given that, while it may be an end in itself, health’s greatest value is instrumental; being healthy allows us to follow our life plans and achieve our goals.
Beauchamp, The History and Theory of Informed Consent (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986), p. 7. O’Neill, Autonomy and Trust, p. 22. A. Maclean, ‘Consent and sensibility’ (2005) 4 International Journal of Ethics 31. The nature of autonomy 11 mean that it is unlikely that the debate will ever be fully resolved in favour of one conception over another. This is not, however, a problem. 8 The caveat is, of course, that unless we are content with incoherent and inconsistent rules, the law, and indeed professional ethical guidelines, must choose one version over another.
Although the value of agency rests in the possibility of control, its importance does not lie in independence from others’ influence. The claim that I would rather make a bad decision than cede the decision 62 63 64 65 66 O’Neill, Autonomy and Trust, p. 7. H. Frankfurt, ‘What we are morally responsible for’, in J. M. Fischer and M. ), Perspectives on Moral Responsibility (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993), p. 286. Hurka, ‘Why value autonomy? ’ (1987) 13 Social Theory and Practice 361, 366.