Posted by 
By Theodor W. Adorno
This vintage e-book by means of Theodor W. Adorno anticipates a few of the subject matters that experience on account that turn into universal in modern philosophy: the critique of foundationalism, the illusions of idealism and the top of epistemology. It additionally foreshadows the various key principles that have been constructed by means of Adorno in his most vital philosophical works, together with detrimental Dialectics.
Against Epistemology is predicated on a manuscript Adorno initially wrote in Oxford in 1934-37 in the course of his first years in exile and therefore transformed in Frankfurt in 1955-56. The textual content was once written as a critique of Husserl’s phenomenology, however the critique of phenomenology is used because the social gathering for a much wider critique of epistemology. Adorno defined this as a ‘metacritique’ which blends jointly the research of Husserl’s phenomenology because the so much complex example of the decay of bourgeois idealism with an immanent critique of the tensions and contradictions inner to Husserl’s idea. the result's a strong textual content which is still essentially the most devastating evaluations of Husserl’s paintings ever written and which heralded the various principles that experience develop into normal in modern philosophy.
Read or Download Against Epistemology: A Metacritique PDF
Similar phenomenology books
Collected Philosophical Papers (Phaenomenologica, Volume 100)
This assortment, now on hand in an inexpensive paperback version, comprises 11 of the main major articles written through Emmanuel Levinas. probably the most vital philosophers of the phenomenological-existential culture, Levinas additional explored and constructed every one of his theses within the vintage philosophical paintings in a different way than Being, or, past Essence.
Edgar Allan Poe: A Phenomenological View (Princeton Legacy Library)
By means of trying to droop ethical, ideological, or mental assumptions, a phenomenological interpretation of literature hopes to arrive "the issues themselves," the fundamental phenomena of being, area, and time, as they're constituted, by way of awareness, in phrases. even if there was a practice of phenomenological feedback in Europe for the final two decades, David Halliburton is the 1st to jot down a basic learn of an American writer from this actual standpoint.
Husserl ofrece l. a. exposición directa del núcleo esencial de las principles de los angeles fenomenología trascendental, tal como lo describió en público por primera vez. Tenemos así ocasión de asistir a l. a. presentación más clara, más didáctica, que el filósofo creyó posible hacer de los grandes pensamientos que ya no había de abandonar en el resto de sus años de hard work infatigable y que tan decisivamente marcaron el rumbo de los angeles filosofía de nuestro siglo.
Husserl and Heidegger: The Question of a Phenomenological Beginning (S U N Y Series in Philosophy)
E-book by way of Stapleton, Timothy J.
Additional resources for Against Epistemology: A Metacritique
Example text
In its place, material philosophizing was promised, though indeed immediately bur dened with the exceedingly questionable concept of value drawn from trade relations. Instruments needed no longer to be sharpened, but rather, as Hegel wished, should be tried out directly on matter. But the phenomenological movement which began as epistemology, later started unflinchingly to withdraw 43 anew from all entities and even their highest concept, that of existence (Dasein), which Husserl in fact originally wished to eliminate.
It is really the demand to arbitrate dialetic concretely. Expressed as a universal principle, mediacy, just as in Hegel, always amounts to spirit. If it turns into positivity, it becomes untrue. Mastering * [In English in the text. ] 25 such aporia is the perennial effort of epistemologies, though none will succeed. Every one of them stands under Anaximander’s curse, whose philosophy of being was one of the earliest but practically prophesied the coming destiny of them all. The metacritique of epistemology requires constructive reflection upon its structure as one of guilt and punishment (Schuld und Strafe), necessary error and futile correction.
While Plato’s philosophy denounced the rhetoricians, who dealt formally with objects about which they understood nothing, he also applied himself to an advocate’s formalism, in the method of conditioning concepts, which surpassed sophistic formalism only in logical consistency. In the contest Socrates must almost always be in the right against those designated as his opponents, even though and because he‘ k n o w s nothing’. Not by chance does it remain in suspense in Agathon’s speech, or occasionally in the Phaedrus, whether Plato is parodying a rhetorical showpiece or presenting a stage of the truth, or, in the end, both.