
By Ranjeev Mittu, Donald Sofge, Alan Wagner, W.F. Lawless
This quantity explores the intersection of strong intelligence (RI) and belief in self sustaining platforms throughout a number of contexts between independent hybrid structures, the place hybrids are arbitrary combos of people, machines and robots. to higher comprehend the relationships among synthetic intelligence (AI) and RI in a fashion that promotes belief among self reliant structures and human clients, this booklet explores the underlying conception, arithmetic, computational types, and box purposes. It uniquely unifies the fields of RI and belief and frames it in a broader context, particularly the potent integration of human-autonomous structures.
A description of the present cutting-edge in RI and belief introduces the learn paintings during this quarter. With this origin, the chapters additional problematic on key examine parts and gaps which are on the middle of potent human-systems integration, together with workload administration, human machine interfaces, group integration and function, complicated analytics, habit modeling, education, and, finally, try and review.
Written through overseas top researchers from around the box of self sufficient platforms examine, Robust Intelligence and belief in self sustaining Systems dedicates itself to completely interpreting the demanding situations and traits of structures that show RI, the basic implications of RI in constructing relied on relationships with current and destiny independent structures, and the potent human platforms integration that needs to outcome for belief to be sustained.
Contributing authors: David W. Aha, Jenny Burke, Joseph Coyne, M.L. Cummings, Munjal Desai, Michael Drinkwater, Jill L. Drury, Michael W. Floyd, Fei Gao, Vladimir Gontar, Ayanna M. Howard, Mo Jamshidi, W.F. Lawless, Kapil Madathil, Ranjeev Mittu, Arezou Moussavi, Gari Palmer, Paul Robinette, Behzad Sadrfaridpour, Hamed Saeidi, Kristin E. Schaefer, Anne Selwyn, Ciara Sibley, Donald A. Sofge, Erin Solovey, Aaron Steinfeld, Barney Tannahill, Gavin Taylor, Alan R. Wagner, Yue Wang, Holly A. Yanco, Dan Zwillinger.
Read or Download Robust Intelligence and Trust in Autonomous Systems PDF
Similar robotics & automation books
Given that robot prehension is established in all sectors of producing undefined, this publication fills the necessity for a entire, updated remedy of the subject. As such, this can be the 1st textual content to deal with either builders and clients, dealing because it does with the functionality, layout and use of business robotic grippers.
Automatic Generation of Computer Animation: Using AI for Movie Animation
We're either enthusiasts of staring at lively tales. each night, earlier than or after d- ner, we continuously sit down in entrance of the tv and watch the animation application, that's initially produced and proven for kids. we discover ourselves changing into more youthful whereas immerged within the fascinating plot of the animation: how the princess is first killed after which rescued, how the little rat defeats the large cat, and so forth.
Adaptive systems in control and signal processing : proceedings
This moment IFAC workshop discusses the diversity and purposes of adaptive structures up to speed and sign processing. some of the methods to adaptive regulate structures are lined and their balance and flexibility analyzed. the amount additionally contains papers taken from poster periods to offer a concise and finished overview/treatment of this more and more very important box.
Control-oriented modelling and identification : theory and practice
This complete assortment covers the state of the art in control-oriented modelling and id options. With contributions from top researchers within the topic, it covers the most equipment and instruments to be had to boost complicated mathematical types appropriate for keep an eye on approach layout, together with an summary of the issues that could come up throughout the layout strategy.
Extra info for Robust Intelligence and Trust in Autonomous Systems
Example text
The robot works under the assumption that those situations occur rarely and most failures/interruptions are a result of poor performance. 3 Learning Trustworthy Behaviors Using an Inverse Trust Metric 39 trust. However, the additional computational complexity of such a function might not provide additional benefits if, like with our robot, we seek general trends in trustworthiness rather than an exact trust value. 5 Trust-Guided Behavior Adaptation The robot uses the inverse trust estimate to infer if its current behavior is trustworthy, untrustworthy, or it does not yet know.
In these situations, even though the operator cannot explicitly tell the robot how trustworthy it is, it would still be beneficial for the robot to infer its trustworthiness. Without full knowledge about how the operator measures trust or the necessary internal information to actually compute the trust value, the robot needs to rely on observable evidence of trust. As we discussed previously, there are numerous factors that have been found to influence a human’s trust in a robot (Oleson et al. 2011).
Their measurement is based on the number of times a human takes control of the robot or warns the robot it is behaving poorly. They have extended this work to also identify increases in trust, but it requires direct feedback from the operator at regular intervals (Kaniarasu et al. 2013). Saleh et al. (2012) have also proposed a measure of inverse trust using a set of expert-authored rules. However, if the robot does not have access to direct feedback or predefined rules, these metrics would not be appropriate to use.