Movement theory of control by Norbert Hornstein; Maria Polinsky

Posted by

By Norbert Hornstein; Maria Polinsky

Show description

Read Online or Download Movement theory of control PDF

Best nursing books

Roach - Introductory Clinical Pharmacology

This center textual content bargains LPN/LVN scholars a transparent, concise creation to pharmacology, targeting easy rules and the nurse's accountability in drug management. equipped via physique procedure, the e-book examines pharmacologic houses and healing functions of drug sessions. precis Drug Tables current well-known and exchange drug names, makes use of, hostile reactions, and ordinary dosage levels.

Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing: Concepts of Care in Evidence-Based Practice

Depend upon the special voice and committed imaginative and prescient of Mary C. Townsend to supply the main essentially written, accomplished textual content for psychiatric psychological wellbeing and fitness nursing. Its evidence-based, holistic method of nursing perform makes a speciality of either organic and behavioral elements. The eighth version of this renowned textual content promises much more of what nursing scholars have to meet the demanding situations of health and wellbeing care this day.

Microbiology demystified

This booklet will demystify the advanced subject of microbiology in a manner that scholars will achieve the mandatory abilities for a number of varied branches of the scientific occupation. From gazing Microorganisms via a Microscope, class of Microorganisms to Immunology & problems of the Immune procedure, Microbial ailments of the physique.

Extra info for Movement theory of control

Example text

Hornstein (2003) and Boeckx & Hornstein (2004: 443) defend the MTC position by pointing out that Wh-islands are quite porous even to further Wh-movement. What did John say how to cook? Landau (2008a: 303–304) shows that Boeckx & Hornstein’s approach to OC across a Wh-phrase is insufficient. He argues that A-movement across (weak) Wh-islands seems to produce unacceptable results on the basis of the following examples: (3) a. Someone inquired how to welcome Malay visitors. b. There were Malay visitors inquired.

Thus, the null preposition must incorporate into promise. , it must obey the Extension Condition), and that by thus incorporating the DP becomes a direct object of the newly formed complex predicate, then a problem arises: to allow the embedded object to traverse the postverbal DP, Mary must be inside a PP. But to passivize, the P must incorporate into promise. The problem is that incorporation into promise must precede movement of pro if cyclicity is to be respected. But if P incorporates into promise then Mary will c-command the embedded clause and thus block movement of pro.

But when we combine (12) and example (4a), we see that the PIC Application appears empirically inadequate: it predicts that example (4a) should be grammatical. Here is why. In example (4a) there is no v in the main clause, thus on the strength of (12) embedded CP should be transparent up to the completion of the main clause (or merger of matrix C): (13) *There T-were [VP inquired [CP how [TP {there} T-to be Malay visitors welcomed]]] CP can be opaque to external probing and Agree only when a higher phase head (v) appears in the phrase marker.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.89 of 5 – based on 20 votes